The Israel-Hamas conflict highlights the growing U.S.-Iran power struggle in the Middle East

The Israel-Hamas conflict highlights the growing U.S.-Iran power struggle in the Middle East.

As the Israeli government prepares for a potential ground incursion into the Gaza Strip, the escalating casualties among both Palestinian and Israeli civilians underscore the gravity of the situation. However, it is crucial to recognize that this conflict is not isolated, but rather part of a larger power struggle for regional influence in the Middle East, primarily involving the United States and Iran.

The United States has historically assumed a significant leadership position in the Middle East. The United States' ability to exert influence on the global stage has been intricately linked to its ability to foster strong and multifaceted relationships with a range of allies. These allies, which include Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, have played a crucial role in bolstering American influence in the realm of international affairs.

Since the advent of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the leadership in Iran has consistently pursued a strategy aimed at enhancing their regional influence while simultaneously consolidating their domestic authority. This approach has entailed a deliberate effort to erode the United States' alliances in the Middle East, thereby serving their overarching objectives. Iran has successfully established a regional network that primarily consists of Shia Muslim entities, notably including the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and the Lebanese militant organization Hezbollah.

Iran has consistently provided support to Hamas, a Sunni Islamist organization and a designated terrorist group by the United States. Hamas currently exercises control over the Gaza Strip. Similar to the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hamas exhibits a steadfast commitment to the objective of dismantling the State of Israel. The dynamic evolution of the ongoing rivalry between the United States is significant. It is of paramount importance to examine the multifaceted dimensions of this geopolitical conflict and assess its potential implications on the broader bilateral relationship.

The prolonged and complex Israel-Palestinian conflict holds significant importance within Iran's broader regional strategy. Iran seeks to exploit this dispute as a means to create divisions between Israel and its neighboring countries, thereby complicating the United States' relationships across the Arab world. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas has undeniably yielded consequential outcomes thus far.

Role of Iran in the Gaza conflict

Iran's involvement in the Gaza conflict has been a subject of significant interest and analysis within the realm of international affairs. The multifaceted nature of Iran's role in this regional conflict has drawn attention from scholars, policymakers, and observers alike. Iran has long been known to provide support to various non-state actors in the Middle East region.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has categorically denied any allegations of direct involvement in the heinous acts perpetrated by Hamas on October 7, 2023, within the borders of Israel. These acts of violence orchestrated by Hamas militants resulted in a significant loss of human life, with approximately 1,400 individuals tragically losing their lives, and over 200 individuals being taken hostage. According to statements made by U.S. officials and other sources, it is currently too soon to ascertain the precise extent of Iran's involvement in the ongoing violence.

The endorsement of the attacks by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, serves as a notable development in the ongoing geopolitical landscape. He has characterized Israel's subsequent military campaign in Gaza as a "genocide," a term that carries significant weight and implications. This characterization has sparked widespread demonstrations against the Israeli offensive across the Middle East, fueled by the mounting number of Palestinian casualties.

The recent Israeli military operations in Gaza, commencing from October 7th, 2023, have resulted in a significant loss of life, with the United Nations reporting a casualty count exceeding 3,780 individuals. Additionally, Iran has warned to take "preemptive" measures against Israel if it continues its offensive.

The ongoing situation between Israel and Hezbollah has escalated to a point where both parties are engaging in frequent exchanges of artillery and rocket fire. Israel has recently implemented a strategic measure by establishing a buffer zone near its border with Lebanon. This decision has prompted the commencement of an evacuation process for Israeli citizens residing in the affected area.

Israel has conducted airstrikes on strategic airports in Syria, a nation with which it has a longstanding adversarial relationship, and which also maintains significant connections with Hezbollah, a prominent regional actor. The recent developments have significantly heightened the risk of Israel, a key ally of the United States, becoming embroiled in a potentially expansive conflict involving a coalition supported by Iran.

Iran's drive to expand its influence in the region

Iran's relentless pursuit to extend its sphere of influence within the region is a matter of great concern and warrants a critical analysis. The actions taken by Iran demonstrate a deliberate and calculated strategy aimed at expanding its power and control beyond its borders. This dedicated approach raises questions about Iran's intentions and the potential consequences for regional stability. By actively seeking to increase its influence, Iran is challenging the existing balance of power in the region. In recent decades, Iran has strategically sought to expand its influence in the region by capitalizing on the existing divergences between the United States and Israel.

The emergence of Hezbollah in Lebanon during the early 1980s was significantly influenced by Iran's involvement. Iran played a crucial role in the establishment and development of Hezbollah, a militant group that has had a profound impact on the region. One notable instance of Iran's support for Hezbollah was its backing of the devastating attacks on the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983. These attacks resulted in significant loss of life and marked a turning point in the conflict in Lebanon. Iran's assistance in building Hezbollah and its involvement in these attacks have had far-reaching consequences, shaping the political and security landscape of the region.

After the downfall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Iran capitalized on the opportunity to align itself with Shiite groups that were sympathetic to its cause. This move was significant as it allowed Iran to strengthen its position in the region by affiliating with factions that shared a common interest and were historically opposed to Iran's rivals, such as Saddam Hussein. By forging these alliances, Tehran effectively expanded its sphere of influence in Iraq, solidifying its presence and furthering its strategic objectives.

The involvement of Iran and Hezbollah in Syria has significantly contributed to the Assad regime's strategic advantage in the prolonged civil war. By providing the government with a range of resources including weapons, intelligence, and military personnel, these actors have played a crucial role in bolstering the regime's position.

The situation in Yemen involves a complex web of geopolitical dynamics, with Iran providing support to Shiite rebel groups who are engaged in armed conflict against the government. This rebellion is further complicated by the involvement of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who are backing the government forces.

Iran's robust support to Palestinian combatants

Iran's persistent commitment to providing extensive support to Palestinian combatants is a notable aspect of its foreign policy agenda. The Islamic Republic has consistently demonstrated its dedication to bolstering the capabilities and resources of Palestinian combatants, thereby playing a significant role in shaping the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In the context of the Palestinian territories, it is worth noting that Iran has been providing support to various militant groups since the 1980s. During the early 1990s, it was observed that Iranian forces and Hezbollah were actively engaged in providing training and support to Hamas fighters within the borders of Lebanon.

During the Second Intifada, a period characterized by a violent Palestinian uprising from 2000 to 2005, Iran notably increased its support to Hamas. This assistance was further reinforced following Hamas' electoral triumph in 2006, which resulted in their assumption of power in the Gaza Strip. Iran has been known to provide both weaponry and financial support to Hamas during the armed conflicts it engaged in with Israel in 2008-2009 and 2014.

The persistent hostilities in the Gaza Strip have played a significant role in maintaining the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a prominent issue within the realm of Middle Eastern politics. The ongoing conflict and heightened tensions have effectively served Iran's strategic objectives of eroding the diplomatic relationships between the United States and Israel with Iran's Arab counterparts, including Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.

The United States has successfully achieved a significant diplomatic milestone through its facilitation of the 2020 Abraham Accords. This historic agreement has resulted in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates establishing formal diplomatic ties with Israel, marking a notable achievement in regional diplomacy. In a significant development, Iran has recently declared its successful negotiation of a diplomatic agreement with Saudi Arabia, marking a pivotal moment in their bilateral relations. This landmark deal, which comes after a prolonged period of severed ties lasting seven years, signifies a potential shift in the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East.

Following the recent declaration, American officials have actively engaged in negotiations to establish a comprehensive framework for diplomatic ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia. However, the ongoing conflict in Gaza has temporarily halted progress towards finalizing this agreement. There have been conjectures put forth by analysts suggesting that Iran potentially played a role in instigating Hamas to carry out attacks against Israel, possibly driven by strategic motivations.

The impending diplomatic challenge

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas presents a multitude of complex diplomatic obstacles for the United States to navigate.

Israel's recent actions, including bombing, the threat of a ground invasion, and restrictions on aid to Gaza, have undoubtedly had a significant impact on the dynamics of the region. These actions have not only energized Israel's enemies but have also strained its relationships with its partners. The use of military force and the imposition of restrictions on aid have undoubtedly escalated tensions and further complicated an already complex situation. Such actions have potential consequences on both regional stability and Israel's diplomatic standing.

In his statement, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has characterized the Israeli assault as a "massacre." This choice of language suggests a strong condemnation of the actions taken by the Israeli government. By using the term "massacre," Erdogan implies that the Israeli assault resulted in a significant loss of life and was carried out brutally and indiscriminately. This critical assessment aligns with Erdogan's previous criticisms of Israeli policies and actions in the region. However, it is important to note that this analysis is based solely on Erdogan's statement In a recent development, Qatar has placed the blame directly on Israel for the ongoing violence. This accusation is in line with the stance taken by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who has condemned Israel's campaign as a form of "collective punishment" against the people of Gaza.

Maintaining global stability and mitigating the escalation of armed conflict

 In light of the current geopolitical landscape, it is imperative to address the pressing issue of preventing a wider war. The potential escalation of conflicts between nations poses a significant threat to global stability and security.

The deterioration of diplomatic relations among certain partners became increasingly evident following the accusation made by Hamas against Israel over the explosion that occurred outside a Gaza hospital on October 17th. Despite assertions by Israel and the United States attributing the explosion to Palestinians, potentially due to inadvertence, there was a rapid proliferation of anti-Israel protests throughout the Middle Eastern region. In the lead-up to President Joe Biden's visit to Israel, an intriguing development unfolded as Jordan decided to cancel the anticipated summit involving Egyptian President el-Sisi, Jordanian King Abdullah II, and Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas. The Biden administration has endeavored to strike a delicate equilibrium by demonstrating robust backing for Israel while concurrently advocating for a measured approach.

During his diplomatic trip to Israel, President Biden expressed support for Israel's inherent right to employ defensive measures in safeguarding its territorial boundaries and populace. Additionally, he sought to deter Iran and other pertinent players from exacerbating the ongoing conflict. Simultaneously, the individual exerted pressure on Israel to adhere to the principles and regulations governing armed conflict, while also successfully negotiating an Israeli commitment to permit a certain degree of humanitarian assistance to enter Gaza via Egypt. On October 21, the Egypt-Gaza border crossing was opened to facilitate the entry of bottled water and medical supplies into the Gaza Strip.

In light of the prevailing tension and animosity in the region, it is noteworthy that the endeavors undertaken by the Biden administration to dissuade Iran and avert the escalation of conflict resonate with the primary concerns of many Arab governments. These governments harbour apprehensions regarding Tehran and its affiliated entities, as they remain acutely mindful of the potential ramifications on both domestic and regional stability. The prevailing perceptions regarding Tehran's role in fostering escalation and regional instability have the potential to influence other nations to realign their interests towards Washington. Advocating for a policy of Israeli restraint is crucial in addressing the ongoing humanitarian crisis and curbing potential gains for Iran in the Gaza conflict.

Back to top button